This is the thread where all offtopic posts will be placed.

The Eiffel Tower has a certain weirdish look to it, if you look at it sideways. Hey, I should be in bed right now! Wow, I'm really bored. I should go do my math HW... O.o a monitor.

You have math homework before school starts? Elephants are pink. What's the train having for dinner?

w0rd.

d00d, st0p teh sp4m!

n0, y0[_] st0p teh sp4m, genesis.

muhaha.

I say it as a word too. But when you write it, it should have all caps, like the acronym that it is.

I didnt think you were deserving of me writing it in caps.

I see, but it is for all to see.

no one else cares.

Yeah, as if I know when to quit.

btw, dont try to sneak in an opinionated statement into an attempt at having the last word.

I wasn't trying to get the last word. I was merely getting this back to the topic that it was.

No, you were trying to end the discussion, you said so, and slipped that in.

I was trying to end the offtopic discussion and return to how Windows pwnz Linux.

You mean return to your un-open-mindness where in your world, everything you say is law.

Law is a bit extreme, more like fact.

And fact is the same as law in this instance.

Sometimes laws can be dictated by opinion, facts cannot.

Well in your little world, your laws are dictated by opinion, not fact. It isnt a fact that there is no god, it is only your opinion.

Regardless, in the context law is the exact same as fact. Its like laws when you think about laws of physics. They are considered fact by the majority of the scientific community. It is defined as a principle. "The term law is often used to refer to universal principles that describe the fundamental nature of something." - Wikipedia

When you say that there is no god, it can be considered a law, and/or a fact.


None of this changes the fact that you are a self centered, egotistical, sociopathic, one-sided, opinionated moron.

I am not one-sided, I like to think of myself as "multifaceted".

Yes, you are. You take your one opinion and decide that everyone else is wrong. You dont even consider that you could be wrong. You dont look into others opinions, you dont think about the reasoning behind others opinions, and you dont ever consider the fact that their opinion is just as viable as your own.

I must be, cuz saying that a discussion needs to end, and throwing in an opinionated statement at the end, is hypocritical.

You haven't had a problem with the poll's outcome because we have never had the type of poll I am talking about here. And I doubt I said,
didnt[sic] represent the actual views of the members", cuz unless the poll is rigged or tampered with, is obviously represents the views of the members.

I wasnt quoting you idiot, but you did say something to that effect. And how can you say that I "must be afraid of being proven wrong because [I] never agree to these kinds of polls." when we have never had this kind of a poll? Contradiction much?

Because the outcome is certain, and I will be right. I have asked members here personally about what they think about our arguments, and they say that I am right. But they are just too lazy to help me.

The only people who have ever helped in an argument have been on my side, and if they dont care to bother backing you up, what makes you think that they really think you're right? If there has never been a poll of this kind, how can you be certain of the outcome? Its impossible.

I am certain that they think I am right because they aren't afraid to tell me when I am wrong, so I can trust that they are telling the truth.

It's not impossible. I mean, there are things where you can be certain of the outcome. When China voted whether or not to use violence to take over Taiwan, everybody except for two people voted yes.

Except that your "friends" never tell you that you are wrong, because the ones who do suddenly are no longer on the list of "friends".

Its impossible when the kind of thing has never been conducted before. There was no way of predicting the outcome of your example. The actual outcome is irrelevant because of this.

I don't think so. I would know better than you, cuz they are my friends and you have never met them. And part of being a good friend is being able to be truthful.

And once again you take the easiest route and ignore the pre-existing issue in favor of a new one that you havnt yet failed.

Humans are all the same, and as you have said previously, are always looking to get an edge over everyone else, and if your "friends" can do so by sucking up to you, then they arent friends, theyre goons.

I wouldn't say they are sucking up to me, as they criticise me a lot and oppose my ideas. Now that is not really what reliable goons do, or goons for that matter.

You don't know how right you are....

Actually, myscrnnm is only like that half the time. The other half he's a good friend. (He was worse in eighth grade, though.)

You cannot base a person's right to live merely on one thing, especially one in which you are merely basing your conclusion on your own opinion.

But I thought you said they agreed with you? Another contradiction much?

Hey, thats how evolution works. The idiots die out. I cant help that you support evolution, yet not when it works against you.

I didn't say that they agree on everything. They just agree with me on most of the arguments that are between you and me. But they disagree with other things, like the superiority of the Japanese.

You sound like Hugo Drax from the James Bond film, Moonraker. He believed that he needed to create a "superhuman" race by transporting people with better genes into space, and then killing all the "imperfect" people on Earth, then return to Earth to start a better race. But the thing is, there will always be genetic mutations that will start these hereditary traits again anyway.

I like monkeys!

GO MONKEYS!

On a side note, evolution keeps those minor, non-life threatening mutations from becoming large problems in the greater population (or promotes a mutation that allows the mutant to be better suited for life).

I do not make myself out to be smart.

The Predators pwnz the Aliens.

Are you sure about that?

He should be, cuz that was a double post.

That was a double post because the one before my previous was moved here by an admin. I didn't post that directly in here.

Maybe cuz it was spam there as well?

You forget - there are posts in this topic made by you too.

Yes, posts that were originally in reply to your offtopic posts that were moved here simultaneously.

No, you started being offtopic, I was just trying to stop you, but you were too adamant (or perhaps too thickheaded) to understand.

The admins obviously dont see it as you trying to get back on topic, or else your posts wouldnt have been moved here as well.

They were only moved here because they were part of an offtopic discussion, but the posts following my posts were offtopic, so the whole conversation had to be moved here.