(added by lappy512)
Topic split from http://forums.krazyletter.com/http://forums.krazyletter.com/index.php?showtopic=4045


"You are a funny man, Mr. [Commander]. Now you die."

It's hard finding quality, and any guy who has had a day where he was just like, "screw it, I'm bored, I'm gunna whack it all day" knows that after the first, any subsequent orgasms within an hour or two are much more intense.

This topic is getting a litte wierd....

Eh?



And how do you know this?

It's from a james bond movie. I substituted Mr Commander for Mr Bond. Anyways...

Three guesses.

Wrong. No Bond villain ever said that, from Dr. No to Gustav Graves, that is not a movie quote.

Maybe it was indianna jones, does it freaking matter? Rhetorical question. The proper answer is, no. No it doesnt matter. It has absolutly nothing to do with current convorsation, so you may now commence dropping dead.

So back on topic:
Relationships = good overall
Sex = overrated
myscrnnm =

I echo HLs final three comments wholeheartedly .

PS - for those of you wondering if this is a chance to get after me, no, Christianity doesn't state that you go to hell for masturbating.

Good, cuz I do plenty of that... be back in half an hour... lol

Aghk. Stop it. I didn't need to know any of that.

, but see, you do it in a respectful manner, unlike certain people around here.

Are you... maybe... aroused?

ahahahaha. You're sick! lol.

Anyways...

Sure it doesn't. And even if it doesn't it still retardedly prohibits things like before marriage, etc. It doesn't make any sense...but hey, its Christianity! What can ya say?

You could say... "I dont want to know your name, all I want is bangbangbang!"

Or not...

Anyway, back to Christianity, the most wacked religion in the cosmos.

Yeah, not sounds good.

And yeah, christianity is pretty messed up, but what can I say? They had me fooled for a couple years.

Really? You were a chirstian?

The part that I don't like at all is the "if you don't join our cult, you rot in hell" thing. I mean, talk about low tolerance levels.....

Christianity isn't really the topic here.

Yeah, between the ages of 5 and 9. Then one day, sitting there listening to the sermon, it hit me. I stood up, muttered to myself and to anyone who could hear me "this is bull****" and left. Havnt been back since.

Yeah, if more people had these sudden revelations, you wouldn't have this...epidemic...of Christians.

PS - Weren't the people around you kinda ticked off?

This is getting a little off topic so I made
http://forums.krazyletter.com/index.php?act=ST&f=11&t=4490

Topic split from

http://forums.krazyletter.com/http://forums.krazyletter.com/index.php?showtopic=4045

You may rot in hell if you deny Jesus, but it also offers the easiest way to get into a place with streets paved with gold. Just believed that Jesus hung on a cross to take away your sins... Hmm... Believe, go to heaven. Deny, burn in hell... Not that difficult of a choice people.

See, this is the mentality that explains why you are so much disliked, space"man".

Well...

There are so many different faiths out there that each promise different paths to salvation, so discovering which one is True isn't exactly easy for everyone. IMO, I think maybe more than one faith could be right, there could easily be multiple afterlifes, right? Anyways, that's just me.

OK, you know what, just stop that. I take enough crap throughout the day at school, I don't need to come home and have to listen to edited like you. So just shut your frickin mouth.

I personally believe that there are no afterlives, and no path to salvation. But that's just me.

You're not alone. There are other smart people out there too, Mynck.

How do you know? The Catholics messed up whatever Christianity started out as during the middle ages. Before Martin Luther, we have no idea how many times the bible was changed, possibly to simply gain power. Even if, in the unlikely event that it was right when it was written, it's far from it today.

PS - No offense to current Catholics, I'm talking about the Catholics during the middle ages, namely the corrupt popes and cardinals who tried to assassinate eachother.

Because we have old testament scrolls dating back to before Christ that align with our current Bible.

New tact. Back in the day, like 20-50 AD, all the catholic leaders got together to decide what would and what wouldnt go into the bible. They chose specific testaments and books to be included in order to influence how people viewed and practiced the religion. Many testaments were left out. Most notably the Dead Sea Scrolls and the testament of Mary Magdeline(sp?). In Tibet they have old old accounts of the times during which Jesus Christ walked the earth that depict a person very similar to the Christ depicted in the Bible, during the same time. It is believed by scholars that this is the same person.

Anyways, just the fact that a group of religious, racist, sexist people got together to decide what would and wouldnt be put into the New Testament shows that something funny is going on. This isnt to say that there is anything wrong with the belief in God, Christ, etc. but that you arent getting the whole story from the Bible. The Bible was created to manipulate large groups of people through their religion, and the way I figure it, people need to know that about their religion.

Most scholars also believe someone named "Jesus of Nazareth" lived in Israel and was hung on a cross. As far as who he was, that's where the Bible and faith comes in.

I didnt say they didnt. The point is, the Bible says that God created everything, and that he sent his "son" to be sacrificed for the sins of the world. That's what people should be getting from the Bible. Everything else you can take or leave, because you arent getting the entire story. A bunch of manipulative catholic leaders got together and decided what would and wouldnt be published. I havnt read the Dead Sea Scrolls or any of the Tibetten(sp?) articles or anything, so I dont know what is being left out, or why. All I know is that the people who founded the christian faith had an agenda to follow, and what they decided was important for everyone to know isnt all there is to know. "Good christians" should be trying to further their beliefs and read up on the whole story, read the texts that were left out of the bible even though they are relevant and potentially important documents.

OK, so maybe they did change it. The important thing is Jesus. The rest is pretty much useless, except for Genesis and Revalations.

Exactly, that is the important part (from a christan point of view), but this is more aimed towards the jerkoffs who try to interpret the bible, pulling "davinci(sp?) code" crap and metaphorically interpret each and every freaking sentence. Who knows? Maybe those 13 years of jesus's life that are missing from the bible are the years that he was a homosexual child molester. Who knows? I dont, I havnt read anything else, and neither does anyone else.

Before you shout out blasphemy, it is intirely possible that was true, due to the constant manipulation of the bible. I mean, if the people in control don't like something in it, why not take it out? For all we know, even the gospels could have been completely different stories. There's also the big debate over whether or not Jesus had a family, and if so, and we knew about it, would everything be changed? Or would we have omitted it. The fact of the matter is, Christianity is far from what it started as, and far from correct. I see basic values expressed through Christianity as very possibly correct, but the notion that non-believers die, anti-homosexuality, etc. that the Church so strongly defends, are not right.

As I said earlier, it's all the catholics fault.

My previous disclaimer applies to this post too, btw.

Found in an ad on this page:
http://www.thegodmovie.com/clip-TheGap.php

Careful, spacey, swearing will get you nowhere.

True, how can people just follow the Bible blindly, expecting everything there to be correct? Even hardcores like spaceman have admitted that the Bible has been changed several times, so why do they hold it to their hearts like its 100% correct?

I've seen that. Dang good movie. In fact, it's taking up 699MB on my hard drive.

And belief of different intagible information relates to intellegence...how?

I never said I think that the Bible has been changed. I said that if it HAD been changed, as long as the story of Jesus remained intact, the rest really wouldn't matter.

Jesus had family. He had some brothers and John the Baptist was probably related (cousin most likely).

ya John was his cousin.

I'm putting my imput in cause I havn't been on here in forever. Haha I'm back.

I'm a christain. I have been baptised. and I can really see how God has changed my life. God put my best friends in my life and I can literally see why. I put my life in God's hands. I told him, U created this life, now guide me through it so I can live the life u wanted me 2. And thats exactly what I'm doing.

And with the whole sex thing. I don't believe in sex before marriage. You wouldn't want to have sex with a person u just think u love. Who knows, the next week u guys could b fighting and broken up. That scare will last forever. Sex is unbreakable. It's forgivable. It's not like "O, u had sex b4 marriage. Ur goin 2 hell" it is forgiven. God will forgive any one of any sin. No matter how big it is. He's not gonna harass u with the sin u hav committed forever. It's just that the more u sin, the farther u get any from God. It builds a wall between u and God. But God can take that all away and forgive u. ......These r just my thoughts

The one thing I dont get about the argument that sex before marriage isn't sacred because you arent married. What's so sacred about marriage? Theres a thing called divorce that screws the pre-marriage abstinence ideology right up the butt with a big rubber dick.

Just my two bits, and no offence to anyone who takes it.

I personally don't care, its just sex is one aspect of life, not all of it... so yeah

Well-put Lizzie (actually, better put than I could have ever said it) .

HerLoss: According to Christians, marraige is the bonding of one man and one woman into "one flesh". We hold it sacred because it was designated to be the union of a man and a woman who love each other more than anything else and are willing to die for each other if need be.

Well put? She contradicted your beliefs by saying that all sins are forgiven. You believe that if I'm not christian, then Jesus tosses me in the pits of hell without forgiving me, remember that?



You ignored his comment about divorces. Why the heck would the protestant church allow that?

He said that all sins are forgiven if you put faith in Jesus.

And yet he struts around, boasting of how he's gonna go to heaven while we'll rot with satan. There's hypocrisy for you.

I dont think the church has any say in it. Marriage is more a legal thing than a religious one. Most marriages are done in churches, by a priest, in the name of "God", but it isnt always so, and it isnt necessary. In fact, to be married one needs only to fill out some paperwork and send it in to their state's government. As such, one needs only to fill out some more paperwork, and a divorce can be filed for absolutly no reason.

What I'm saying is, christians DO that regardless of what their holy sacred bible tells them. That IS hypocritical, you agree?