What do you think?

Why are we in Iraq, again? Shouldn't we be hunting for terrorists?

yes, we should.

We have to stop the insurgents first.

There would never have been any insurgents if we hadn't gone there in the first place.

Also, I think the US govnernment went into Iraq for the something TOTALLY different then what they supposedly told us. I mean, the whole publicity behind going there was a farse.

But that was because Bush knew that if he told the truth, people wouldn't want to go to war.

So you would rather have our troops getting killed by insurgents?! How cruel, when those people are risking their lives so that we can live peacefully.

Our troops wouldn't get killed by insurgents if we hadn't gone there in the first place......

Do you really think that is totally their choice? Some of them joined the military years ago, not knowing what would happen. They joined to defend our country. And now you're wishing that they will die and insulting them when they are fighting the insurgents to save us? Your lack of gratuity disgusts me.

What do you mean wishing they would die? That's the point. If they never went into Iraq, then they wouldn't have died, and there would never have been any insurgents.

So you think it is in their control to go to Iraq?! When they join the military, they don't know what to expect! How can you bash them while you sit in your house playing Halo while there are innocent people dying to save us?!

It's obviously not their fault! We're bashing Bush!

You made it sound like their fault. And Bush is trying to save the nation from the destruction of terror.

And... why hunting for terrorists in Iraq?

Because Bush is pretty stupid.

And so is Rumsfeld, cause he's the guy who's directing this invasion.

There may be terrorists in Iraq. After all there are the insurgents, who are just as bad as terrorists. In a way, they are terrorists, cuz they induce terror.

Ah hah! So you don't think Bush is responsible. he is just a scapegoat then, so you can stop bashing him now.

Rumsfeld and Bush are on the same level of stupidity.

Which is why there are people more fit to be presidents that dubbya.

No, Rumsfeld is stupider.

Bush is definitely dumber than Rumsfeld. At least Rumsfeld is smart, in an evil sort of way. Bush isn't smart at all.

Maybe Bush just acts dumb. I mean, Rumsfeld has some pretty stupid ideas.

Like what, eh?

Oh my fugging god... not this again.

warned for bypassing the filter

Yes, this again!

*evil smile*

let the flames begin!

Has anyone seen Farenheit 9/11??? Great documentry...A lot of people said that it wasn't true

although some content in there might be questionable, yes, I agree with you that it is a great documentary.

most of these people were coincidentally right-wing conservative

I actually put down the cash to go see it in the theater. Great movie, and I also saw the Michael Moore hate movie Farenhype 9/11 (haha, pirated that one), which was really stupid.

Speaking of Michael Moore, I also saw Bowling for Columbine, which was pretty sweet. Does anyone know of any other good ones he's done?

I do not know of its validity, but it was a pretty funny movie.

and it was very controversial too

I am not supportive of Michael Moore though, he is a bit of an idiot.

As are you.

I don't need you to tell me that. My level of stupidity is not that high.

Oh, so you already understood that you were an idiot? Good, that means I dont have to tell you again.

You never had to tell me that in the first place. Like I said, my level of stupidity is not that high.

Stop fighting!

Thats what you said. You are not so stupid that you dont know that you are an idiot. Gotcha.

This is why you make a terrble moderator. You can't tell the difference between a mere conversation and a fight.

When people start calling each other idiots, that's a bad sign.

Myscrnnm never called me an idiot, he was trying to tell me that he was intelligent enough to know that he was an idiot.

Watch the flamebait.

No, seriously. Look back at the convorsation, thats exactly what he was doing.

That's obviously not what he meant to say, though.

Thats not what he would say if he saw someone else do the same.

Exactly. I mean, I don't think you're a genius, but we were just having a polite conversation and then the Korps Commander barged in and was like, "HEY HEY HEY!!!!!!!1". Now who is in the wrong here?

Calling people "idiot" is seen as starting a flamewar/argument.

Starting is not the same as being in progress.

Whatever. The point is, its still unacceptable.

Offensive, perhaps. Unacceptable, no. What is unacceptable is your offtopicness.

KC is a mod and it is his right to interpret the rules. If he interprets them to mean that it is unnacceptable, then it is unnacceptable.