Ignorant fool, a skilled photographer can make even the ugliest ducking seem like an elegant swan. Just because you have no skill in the art of photography does not make it any less beautiful.

Should this be moved to a technology forum, or remain here?

STOP TRYING TO GET ME WARNED! This does not pertain to the technology of photography, but the art of photography.

I wasn't trying to get you warned. I was asking the members about whether I should move the topic to one of the technology forums.

And you wouldn't get warned anyway, because an admin/moderator obviously moved your first post here from another topic to this topic,

No! I PUT THIS HERE MYSELF!

Photography is cool but really you can distort anything that you want!

Also, myscrnnm, stop yelling at mods or admins.

Well, first of all, you are not doing a very good job, making mistakes, being biased against me, doing a cursory examination, going offtopic, et cetera.

This is a fine example of paranoia. Either that or (more likely) a bad mood.

It is not paranoia. I mean seriously, the Korps Commander has done a sloppy job of being a mod. In my opinion, and Michelle's, I could do a lot better job.

Just because I don't fine the "Nintendo fanboys" as much as you want me to, doesn't mean that I do a sloppy job.

And why do you complain when I follow the rules when warning you for breaking the rules?

First of all, the Nintendo fanboys have been doing a lot of bad stuff, I am the real victim here of their heinous crimes (and NO, Mynck. Heinous does not consititute as sexual innuendo!!!!).

Second of all, I did not break the rules.

I wasn't going to say that it was.

You're just saying that cuz you know you were going to say it, but I was a step ahead of you!

I still don't get it. Wait. By saying that, you've implied that it could be taken as sexual stuff. You're admitting that you considered it, and decided to put it there anyways. Should that be fined or warned?

Hasn't lappy already told you that you can't fine people, you can only warn them???????????????

I'm not going to get involved in this. You decide if that deserves a warn or not.

Neither, because I was merely thinking of all the possible repercussions of doing so, but I did not intend sexual innuendo in this case.

But you did consider that it could be considered that?

Yes, because you have a habit of thinking that when I say stuff, there is sexual innuendo.

And Mynck usually thinks rationally.

Usually, but not always.